Remove Comment capabilities from Manuscripts

New Feature Addition · Manuscripts · Created by kaixabu
accepted

What functionality is missing? What is unsatisfying with the current situation?

Currently, Manuscripts allow comments to be posted even when the comment section is hidden via CSS. While hiding the .homer-part-comments element removes the comment interface from the visible page, the backend still accepts comment submissions. This allows automated bot accounts to continue posting comments even though readers cannot see or interact with the comment section.   As a result, spam comments are still being generated and stored in the system. These often advertise external services or attempt to engage the author. In many cases, deleting these comments produces an error, making manual moderation unreliable.   Because bots must create accounts to post, their activity is visible through new user registrations and comment notifications. However, there is currently no way for authors to fully disable commenting on specific manuscripts or chapters. This creates unnecessary moderation overhead and exposes authors to ongoing spam activity even when the comment section has been intentionally hidden.  

How does this feature request address the current situation?

Adding a backend option to enable or disable comments on manuscripts (or individual chapters) would prevent comment submissions entirely. When disabled, the system would reject any attempt to post a comment rather than simply hiding the interface.   This would immediately stop automated spam comments on chapters where discussion is not needed. It would also remove the need for authors to rely on CSS workarounds or ongoing moderation of bot activity.   As an alternative or complementary improvement, World Anvil could detect when the comment container is hidden via CSS and automatically disable comment submission for that page. However, a direct backend toggle for comments would likely be simpler and more reliable.   Additionally, fixing the current error that sometimes occurs when attempting to delete spam comments would help authors manage unwanted posts until a broader solution is implemented.  

What are other uses for this feature request?

A comment toggle would be useful in several additional scenarios:
  • Authors who publish narrative chapters but prefer feedback through forums, Discord, or other channels
  • Early drafts or private manuscript sections where discussion is not desired
  • Completed works where the author wants to preserve the text without ongoing commentary
  • Reducing moderation burden for creators with large audiences
  • This feature would give authors more control over how readers interact with their work while also improving protection against automated spam.

    Another potential enhancement could involve automated moderation for new accounts. Since spam comments typically originate from newly created accounts, the system could flag accounts under a certain age (for example, less than 30–60 days old) that post multiple comments across manuscripts within a short time period. These could be automatically queued for backend review or temporarily limited until verified. Or even if flagged for the author as potential spam and allow moderation before being visible? (Assuming we can fix the deletion issue).   This type of trust-age or rate-limiting system could significantly reduce automated spam activity while still allowing genuine readers to participate.

    The Team's Response

    Thanks for the suggestion! We'll add an option to disable comments in Manuscript (on a Manuscript by Manuscript basis). Besides the concerns about spam comments, this setting will be consistent with how you can do the same with world coments. We're also working on new/better moderation tools on our side.   Related to that, there was a bug that prevent comments on Manuscripts from being deleted. The bug has now been fixed.
    Current score

    53/300 Votes · +13004 points

    Votes Cast

    • +300

      by BCGR_Wurth
      on 2026-05-02 22:02
    • +300

      by Mochimanoban
      on 2026-04-26 22:07
    • +300

      by A Mischievous Unicorn
      on 2026-04-20 19:23
    • +300

      by GMSeth
      on 2026-04-17 21:57
    • +100

      by A Fluffy Unicorn
      on 2026-04-15 03:12
    • +300

      by Autumn Fae
      on 2026-04-12 12:06
    • +100

      by 0uthouse
      on 2026-04-10 11:12
      At the very least it seems logical to eliminate mechanisms that allow a disabled feature to be used, such as the chats mentioned.   The point about world owners possibly wanting to direct chat to an alternative source seems entirely valid.
    • +300

      by SoulLink
      on 2026-04-06 08:38
    • +300

      by devinsxdesigns
      on 2026-04-03 19:57
      I see lots of good suggestions here. SOMETHING needs to happen. I have bot/spam comments on most of my manuscripts, most of which I can't delete because of errors/bugs. I like worldanvil but I am doing a lot more writing these days that strictly worldbuilding, and this issues is making me reconsider where I spend my money.
    • +300

      by Malleus Beneficarum
      on 2026-04-02 22:35
    • +300

      by Keon Croucher
      on 2026-03-29 08:42
      So I would instead of a nuclear option first ask the team to consider....why does the worldbuilding side of the content created here seem to have less of this problem/nearly none. I've been running the experiment myself (I suggest everyone try it) where I post manuscript chapters as prose in my world setting under a category I've named *Tales from Valerick*. (I've taken a couple month hiatus cause health reasons and getting a Pathfinder campaign under way)   Interestingly every manuscript piece ends up with at least 1-2 bot comments within a couple weeks. Prose articles in world shared just as loudly and often to both followers of world and me, as well as on the discord server and yet....*crickets* on the prose articles and worldbuilding side when it comes to bot/spam/scam comments compared to manuscripts. Why? What is different about these two systems, if anything? That would be the query they might wish to investigate first.
    • +100

      by LittleRaider
      on 2026-03-29 00:36
    • +300

      by Kwyn Marie
      on 2026-03-28 19:41
      I hadn't been able to delete the bot comments, so I stopped trying, but I would love to get rid of them. While I appreciate real people commenting on my stories, since I only get bots now, comments are no longer useful.
    • +300

      by Kummer Wolfe
      on 2026-03-28 17:43
      YES! please oh yes please. I use Manuscripts regularly, and I'm getting hit DAILY with bots and scammers flooding the comments. They come in as freemen so I have no idea if they are a real person, or a real problem!
    • +300

      by Jarissa
      on 2026-03-28 16:34
      Any option that puts more power over the work into the hands of the one who did the work, that is the ethical choice. Add on top the excellent explainer here of additional uses beyond bot-halting, and I cannot see why the users World Anvil wants here would NOT appreciate this option. Thank you for suggesting it.
    • +300

      by Graylion
      on 2026-03-28 16:31
    • +100

      by JoellaKay
      on 2026-03-27 16:54
      I think better controls by the author would be best, but in the meantime, being able to disable comment submission (until a better solution is developed) would help many authors.
    • +1

      by Elb Tenebris
      on 2026-03-25 09:46
    • +300

      by DaionGM
      on 2026-03-24 19:56
    • +300

      by violaceous
      on 2026-03-22 16:19
    • +100

      by NicoleAntoinette
      on 2026-03-22 01:22
    • +300

      by kerahope
      on 2026-03-18 18:57
    • +300

      by Ebsfive
      on 2026-03-17 14:47
    • +300

      by DMFW
      on 2026-03-13 18:32
      I'd welcome some improvements to give greater control here, even if I'm not exactly sure of the best solution. I've recently started to get a number of comments on old manuscripts from WA accounts that open and then close. It looks increasingly likely based on the style of the messages that they've been generated by an AI to be flattering and to try and trigger engagement. Of course author's want engagement with genuine readers and I am adopting the policy of replying politely and honestly to the posts that stay up even though I suspect there is just a machine at the end of them. It's a bit dispiriting to have to question the motives of every reply and I'd hate to miss a genuine reader or be rude to one, but at the same time I can see it could become a pain dealing with this kind of spam.
    • +300

      by Nulcheck
      on 2026-03-13 13:32
    • +300

      by A Frightened Dwarf
      on 2026-03-12 14:31
    • +100

      by Digelfox
      on 2026-03-12 00:42
      While the idea of automated moderation for new accounts is not a bad idea, it should also have things like subscription status or as thereasonwhy said should have either a bio or the abiility to filter out words in case new accounts are human made and want to comment on some works that they like as there are some newer users who might be reccomended to this site by writer friends or maybe DND players who see things other than DND that they want to get into and it wouldn't be fair for them to be flagged as spam when they are simply new to the site.
    • +1

      by SyrenMoon
      on 2026-03-11 23:01
      I really love the vision, and while this is a far better strategy than anything we're currently working with, I feel as though closing down comments may not be conducive to the legitimate users in regards to us building our communities on WA. I worry that audiences of smaller creators might see the removal of comments from manuscripts as more of a deterrent to engage on WA, and we all know that interaction is crucial.   Thank you for bringing up the bot spamming and the need to fix the delete button. I can see if we had a function to field our own incoming manuscript comments/guestbook posts, as that's where the bots flock to, but I can also understand how staggering that could be for the larger creators.   I really like the idea of flagging new accounts for authors and world-builders; maybe the addition of comment locking an account after a certain number of comments/posts in a day/month could help. (since the bots come to WA every 2 - 3 months.), or the potential spam user can be flagged for both author/wb and WA devs upon a certain number of comments/posts.
    • +300

      by MoonWolf
      on 2026-03-11 18:37
    • +300

      by Kranjax
      on 2026-03-11 16:00
      I do like this idea, but it should be expanded beyond just manuscripts. I think a good way to start is to see the comment frequency of suspected bot accounts, or new accounts, and limit the allowed time.   I personally recieve more bot comments than legitimate ones, and I doubt new human users just start commenting on everything they see.   I'm generally in favor of the idea, but outright blocking the ability to comment does seem kinda blunt.  
    • -1

      by Thereasonwhy
      on 2026-03-11 15:30
      I like the idea of being able to remove the option, but I do not like this being the option to deal with this outbreak. Just removing commenting capabilities seems very blunt and heavy handed. I still want people to be able to comment on everything, but having additional control over manuscripts (that badly needs many updates) is quite appealing.   I think outright limiting commenting capabilities for manuscripts isn't needed. I think the problem lies in the way WA allows free accounts to operate. They are not watched, they are not limited and they are free to do spam whatever they feel like. This is attacking a symptom, not the problem. Accounts that tick off these categories should be flagged for review.   1) Free account   2) accounts that immediately start commenting on other authors work's without any content themselves.   3) Should accounts from above mentioned issues fill their world with "slop" to circumvent these requirements, should be flagged as well.   I think a rework of how the free accounts operate is more useful. Force them to create an Author's Bio. Enforce content creation or subscriber activity (for players in Campaigns), Enforce some time of character creation. If you have to make these bots work before being able to comment, they won't attack WA as low hanging fruit.
    • +1

      by A Rambunctious Dimensional Horror
      on 2026-03-11 15:13
    • +300

      by WeStanNikolai
      on 2026-03-11 10:57
    • +300

      by Piggie4299
      on 2026-03-11 08:04
      I feel there isn't enough moderation for the comments in general and turning off comments should be only one of the options available to me. There should be options to limit commenters by age or by subscription status or by if they are following or have been following for a certain amount of time. There should be ways to limit the new account auto bots from spamming me. I'm getting swamped and can't keep up.
    • +300

      by bphilippe
      on 2026-03-11 06:49
    • +1

      by A Goodhearted Kobold
      on 2026-03-11 04:15
    • +300

      by Calithrae
      on 2026-03-10 21:09
    • +100

      by Davey3223
      on 2026-03-10 18:00
    • +300

      by PhntmDrgn
      on 2026-03-10 14:16
    • +300

      by Syntaritov
      on 2026-03-10 02:23
    • +300

      by Michael Chandra
      on 2026-03-09 22:40
    • +300

      by DramaticDragons
      on 2026-03-09 18:14
    • +300

      by Rockerboy911
      on 2026-03-09 09:50
    • +300

      by A Uncontrollable Bananafolk
      on 2026-03-09 05:22
      I fully support allowing users to have more freedom to decide where they would like comments to be enabled especially in the face of the current spam bot comments and the added work in moderating those comments. However, since targeted deletion of spam comments should work, I highly recommend anyone that has received the error to go upvote the bug report that kaixabu created (https://www.worldanvil.com/udan-tracker/c1144280-0550-41f5-95ad-17ce762b3007/view) so that the devs know how many people this is effecting.
    • +300

      by Lonnie makes mayhem
      on 2026-03-09 04:16
    • +300

      by JasonKnightman
      on 2026-03-08 20:40
      Not being able to delete the comments has literally made me delete and remake the **entire manuscripts** just to remove them (since all i had were spammer ones). Had to rebuild all my article links of course.   Now, I have another, and it's triggering since I can't delete the comment itself. I'm holding off deleting the manuscripts again in case even more appear so that I can do multiples with one changeover.   However, if Truly Legitimate comments should show up, this won't be an option anymore. *SOMETHING*, if not this exact remedy, needs to be done, please. Thank you~
    • +300

      by A Fluffy Bananafolk
      on 2026-03-08 13:37
    • +300

      by A Filthy Devil
      on 2026-03-07 23:56
    • +300

      by Those2Nerds
      on 2026-03-07 19:41
      WA needs more moderation tools in general and disabling comments is a big one. Ideally, this is in addition to other changes to reduce the spam/scam comments. Nobody should feel forced into disabling comments just to avoid spam.
    • +300

      by Tris
      on 2026-03-07 17:42
    • +300

      by Rahjar
      on 2026-03-07 17:03
      Anything that prevents bots from being toxic sounds like an improvement to me.
    • +300

      by MathuinDaBurr
      on 2026-03-07 13:44
    • +1

      by Asmo
      on 2026-03-07 11:41
    • +300

      by kaixabu
      on 2026-03-07 11:21